I am currently performing tensile tests on the Instron 6800 Series single column system at the Engineering Design Lab. I am using the ASTM D638 specimen for my tests, and each is printed out of PLA on the Bambu Lab X1E 3D printer. The software for the Instron has a bit of a learning curve that I am trying to figure out.
For this first round of testing, I printed the specimens with infill percentages in increments of 10%.
I wanted to determine how much the infill percentage correlated with the tensile strength of these dogbones.
I am planning to use an extensometer to determine stress and strain relationships of FDM 3D printed parts. Stress-strain curves results are theoretically identical for a material and independent of the specimen, but since FDM 3D prints are highly anisotropic and nonuniform, the printing parameters and orientations will vastly affect the stress strain curve.
This is my first test using different infill percentages. The specimen number corresponds to the infill percentage, where specimen 7 has 70% infill. Looking at the results, there is a general trend in both of the charts, that conflict with each other.
The first graph shows that increasing the infill increases the force and the displacement, where specimen 5 is most likely a fluke.
The second graph shows that increasing the infill increases the maximum force but decreases the displacement. There is a notable exception for 100% infill, where it has the high displacement and the highest maximum force. I believe this is due to the nature of 100% infill. The other infill patters use an alternating pattern to support the model from many directions, while the 100% infill has a uniform direction for the infill. The slicer even told me this; it said that the grid infill is not compatible with 100% and that I needed to switch to rectilinear infill.
To fully determine these possibilities, I will be testing many more of these samples to find the general curve for each infill.